![]() Twitter: Mastodon: Web: - Instagram: LinkedIn: danielrubino1 (opens in new tab) In addition, he has studied at Sienna College, the University of Connecticut, Boston University, and the CUNY Graduate Center with political science and linguistics degrees. in linguistics in the neurology of language. In addition, he manages the staff, directs content, and is a YouTube personality, head reviewer, analyst, and podcast co-host.īefore working on Windows Central, Daniel was a polysomnographer at Weill-Cornell Medical College and NY Presbyterian in New York City, a movie theater projectionist for 17 years, Emergency Medical Technician in Connecticut, and was studying for a Ph.D. ![]() In 2010, he took over duties as Editor-in-Chief, moved to Executive Editor in 2020, and returned to Editor in Chief in 2022. He has been writing about Microsoft since 2007, when the site first launched under WMExperts (and later Windows Phone Central). In short, if you become clear about your requirements, there might be people out there to guide and help you.Daniel Rubino is the Editor in Chief of Windows Central. The question is, would you want to achieve a certain aesthetic, or are just intricate complex patterns your requirement? In that case, fractals such as the Koch snowflake or the Hilbert curve, various cycloids (spirograph), etc might be useful for you. The basic features of Blender that I used in this case were the array modifier (applied to a basic curvy path element), the path modifier and the ability to modify the radius (pattern width) on the modifying path, achieving variable line widths. I once did machine stitching patterns in Blender 3D, with the help of a little python script I wrote to translate the repeating patterns into the binary machine stitching format. You will have to go through this learning process - I sincerely doubt that cost-free software exists that does what you want without any implementation effort. ![]() I am not familiar with Guilloche patterns, but know some of the open-source graphics software and their embedded extension languages pretty well. So, to summarize: Are any of you familiar with the mathematical background not just of simple spirographs, but more sophisticated Guilloche-based patterns, as seen, for example, here on the Austrian 100 Schilling banknote or perhaps the production background of banknotes, bonds and the like as regards these Guilloche patterns? , I was wondering, whether any of you are familiar with the production background for Guilloche patterns for these documents? Given that most banknotes are printed from a steel-cut die (indirectly), I'd imagine some Guilloche lathe to cut the pattern into the steel one way or another, but I can't find any information on how this is done. Aside from that, I've grown very interested in the mathematical background of the above mentioned software and I'm wondering, given my familiarity with realization of similarly "mathematical" graphics through code, whether such more sophisticated Guilloche-based patterns could to some extent be realized even by myself with some tinkering and playing - stressing "to some extent".Īside, since these patterns can mostly be found on documents like banknotes, bonds. Alternative software is nice, but it doesn't really help me in what I'm trying to achieve, since they're usually limited to very basic guilloche patterns, mostly representing nothing but a digital version of a simple spirograph. beyond my financial reach and my educational institution has no ability to purchase any of these licenses either, I was wondering whether any of you are familiar with approaches to generating Guilloche-based patterns in the same way - a mostly mathematical endeavor, I suppose. ![]() For the sake of design work in the safety print scene, software able to produce sophisticated Guilloche-based patterns, such as Cerberus or Excentro, would be extremely useful, if not necessary for some aspects of my work.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |